From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weinstein v. Nathan Banks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 17, 1951
279 App. Div. 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Opinion

December 17, 1951.


In an action to recover damages for conspiracy to induce the corporate defendant to breach its employment contract with plaintiff, defendants appeal from an order denying their motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. That plaintiff has alleged a good cause of action against the corporate defendant for breach of contract has been determined in the companion appeal ( Weinstein v. Primrose Blouse Co., ante, p. 764) decided simultaneously herewith. Whether or not the individual defendants may be held liable in this action must be determined on a trial. ( Vassardakis v. Parish, 36 F. Supp. 1002, 1005.) Johnston, Acting P.J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Weinstein v. Nathan Banks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 17, 1951
279 App. Div. 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)
Case details for

Weinstein v. Nathan Banks

Case Details

Full title:BEN WEINSTEIN, Respondent, v. NATHAN BANKS et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 17, 1951

Citations

279 App. Div. 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)