Weinheimer v. Weinheimer

Full title: KATHY WEINHEIMER, Respondent, v. RICHARD WEINHEIMER, Appellant

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jul 2, 1998

252 A.D.2d 363 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

675 N.Y.S.2d 536

Opinion

July 2, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Irene Duffy, J.).

We do not find that the motion court improvidently exercised its discretion to structure the distributive award equitably ( see, Price v. Price, 69 N.Y.2d 8, 19). Defendant has not shown that continued compliance with child care and maintenance requirements would amount to an extreme hardship ( see, Katz v. Katz, 188 A.D.2d 827). We have considered defendant's remaining arguments and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Ellerin, Nardelli, Wallach and Saxe, JJ.