From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weingram & Assocs., P.C. v. Grayzel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Jan 8, 2013
Civil Action No. 10-2362 (SDW) (D.N.J. Jan. 8, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-2362 (SDW)

01-08-2013

WEINGRAM & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH GRAYZEL, M.D., Defendant/Counterclaimant, v. WEINGRAM & ASSOCIATES, P.C., EDWARD WEINGRAM, ESQ., JOHN DOE 1-20 (fictitious names for real parties), Counterclaim Defendants.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

ORDER


ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This matter comes before this Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of United States Magistrate Judge Madeline Cox Arleo ("Magistrate Judge Arleo"), filed on December 20, 2012. No objections have been filed to the R&R.

On December 12, 2012, an Order to Show Cause hearing was held before Magistrate Judge Arleo.

This Court has reviewed the reasons set forth on the record by Magistrate Judge Arleo, the R&R, and the other documents on file in this matter. Based on the foregoing, and for good cause shown, it is hereby

ORDERED that the R&R of Magistrate Judge Arleo, filed on December 20, 2012 is ADOPTED as the conclusions of law of this Court.

The cross motion of defendant Dr. Joseph Grayzel to remand this matter to the Superior Court of New Jersey is GRANTED.

SO ORDERED.

Susan D. Wigenton, U.S.D.J. Orig: Clerk
cc: Judge Arleo

Parties


Summaries of

Weingram & Assocs., P.C. v. Grayzel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Jan 8, 2013
Civil Action No. 10-2362 (SDW) (D.N.J. Jan. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Weingram & Assocs., P.C. v. Grayzel

Case Details

Full title:WEINGRAM & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH GRAYZEL, M.D.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Jan 8, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-2362 (SDW) (D.N.J. Jan. 8, 2013)