From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weiler v. Cranny

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 30, 1995
215 A.D.2d 752 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

May 30, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.).


Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

Because the plaintiffs' motion to reargue and renew was not based on any additional, material facts, it is properly deemed a motion to reargue, and no appeal lies from an order denying reargument (see, Savory v Romex Realty Corp., 194 A.D.2d 601; Foley v Roche, 68 A.D.2d 558). Bracken, J.P., Rosenblatt, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Weiler v. Cranny

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 30, 1995
215 A.D.2d 752 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Weiler v. Cranny

Case Details

Full title:JOAN WEILER et al., Appellants, v. SUSAN C. CRANNY, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 30, 1995

Citations

215 A.D.2d 752 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
627 N.Y.S.2d 956