From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weil v. Perry

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 12, 2017
154 A.D.3d 516 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

10-12-2017

In re Judith WEIL, Petitioner, v. Hon. W. Franc PERRY, etc., et al., Respondents.

Epstein & Weil LLC, New York (Judith Weil of counsel), and Eric Nelson, Staten Island, for petitioner. Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C., New York (Karen M. Lager of counsel), for Law Office of Jeffrey Samel & Partners, respondents.


Epstein & Weil LLC, New York (Judith Weil of counsel), and Eric Nelson, Staten Island, for petitioner.

Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C., New York (Karen M. Lager of counsel), for Law Office of Jeffrey Samel & Partners, respondents.

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,

Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Justice W. Frank Perry has elected, pursuant to CPLR 7804(I), not to appear in this proceeding.

MANZANET–DANIELS, J.P., MAZZARELLI, WEBBER, OING, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Weil v. Perry

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 12, 2017
154 A.D.3d 516 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Weil v. Perry

Case Details

Full title:In re Judith WEIL, Petitioner, v. Hon. W. Franc PERRY, etc., et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 12, 2017

Citations

154 A.D.3d 516 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
61 N.Y.S.3d 492