From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weidow v. Caskey

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Apr 1, 2008
Case No.: 3:07cv517/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Apr. 1, 2008)

Opinion

Case No.: 3:07cv517/RV/EMT.

April 1, 2008


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated March 19, 2008. Petitioner has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections.

Having considered the report and recommendation, and any timely filed objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 5) is DISMISSED without prejudice on the ground that the abstention doctrine set forth in Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S. Ct. 746, 27 L. Ed. 2d 669 (1971) applies.

3. All pending motions are DENIED as moot.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Weidow v. Caskey

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Apr 1, 2008
Case No.: 3:07cv517/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Apr. 1, 2008)
Case details for

Weidow v. Caskey

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT THEODORE WEIDOW, Petitioner, v. LARRY CASKEY, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Apr 1, 2008

Citations

Case No.: 3:07cv517/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Apr. 1, 2008)