Weidow v. Anderson

Full title: DR. ROBERT THEODORE WEIDOW, PH.D., Plaintiff, v. MIKE ANDERSON, et al.…

Court: United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Jan 16, 2008

CASE NO.: 3:07cv510/LAC/MD (N.D. Fla. Jan. 16, 2008)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 3:07cv510/LAC/MD.

January 16, 2008

ORDER

LACEY COLLIER, District Judge

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated December 11, 2007. The plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as malicious pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) for plaintiff's abuse of the judicial process.

3. In the alternative, this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

4. All pending motions are DENIED as moot.

5. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED.