From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weidmann v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 24, 1991
582 So. 2d 1251 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-02101.

July 24, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Pinellas County, Stanley R. Mills J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Kevin Briggs, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Marc E. Brandes, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, for appellee.


Appellant was convicted of sexual battery of and committing a lewd and lascivious act upon a child under the age of sixteen over whom he had familial authority. He challenges the trial court's modification of his probation that imposes a special condition which precludes him from living within a three-quarter's mile radius of any school for minors. Pursuant to the supreme court's recent decision in Clark v. State, 579 So.2d 109 (Fla. 1991), in which it was held that a trial court may not enhance probation unless a violation of probation has been formally charged and the probationer has been given notice and hearing, we reverse the order modifying appellant's probation and remand the matter to the trial court.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and RYDER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Weidmann v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 24, 1991
582 So. 2d 1251 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Weidmann v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH C. WEIDMANN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jul 24, 1991

Citations

582 So. 2d 1251 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Russo v. State

Finding that Clark mandated such result, this court vacated the modification order, and the portion of the…

Perez v. State

Pursuant to section 948.06, Florida Statutes (2000), the trial court may modify the terms and conditions of…