In Weiderman v. Recklinghausen (303 N.Y. 633), the change was from one room plus three shared to five rooms, none of them shared.
Summary of this case from Powless v. RomneyArgued October 4, 1951
Decided October 18, 1951
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, O'MARA, J.
Rubin Brodsky for appellant.
John W. Branch for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ.
In Weiderman v. Recklinghausen (303 N.Y. 633), the change was from one room plus three shared to five rooms, none of them shared.
Summary of this case from Powless v. RomneyIn Weiderman v. Recklinghausen (303 N.Y. 633), the change was from one room plus three shared to five rooms, none of them shared.
Summary of this case from Powless v. RomneyFull title:ROBERT C. WEIDERMAN, Appellant, v. MARIE RECKLINGHAUSEN, Respondent
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Oct 18, 1951
In order for plaintiffs to recover on the theory that the rent charged exceeded the maximum legal rent, it is…
Strunk v. HayesOrder of the Onondaga County Court and judgment of the Syracuse Municipal Court modified in accordance with…