From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weichert v. Wilson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 19, 1993
198 A.D.2d 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

November 19, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Hayes, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Pine, Balio, Doerr and Boomer, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion denied, cross motion granted, and complaint and lis pendens reinstated. Memorandum: The court erred in granting defendant Wilson's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, vacating the lis pendens filed against the real property at issue, and denying plaintiff's cross motion to dismiss defendant Wilson's affirmative defense of res judicata. Defendant Wilson's motion, which was based on that affirmative defense, relied on the denial of plaintiff's motion for a temporary injunction in another action. Defendant Wilson failed to establish that the action has been dismissed and plaintiff avers that it is still pending; thus, the doctrine of res judicata does not apply (see, 9 Carmody-Wait 2d, N Y Prac § 63:430; cf., Ashcraft Excavating Co. v Clark, 79 A.D.2d 722, lv denied 52 N.Y.2d 705).


Summaries of

Weichert v. Wilson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 19, 1993
198 A.D.2d 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Weichert v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:SUSAN M. WEICHERT, Appellant, v. KEITH WILSON et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 19, 1993

Citations

198 A.D.2d 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
605 N.Y.S.2d 1007

Citing Cases

RIS Real Props., Inc. v. APF 286 Mad LLC

However, the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel are applicable "when [the] claim between the…