From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weglarz v. Burkiewicz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 24, 1949
275 App. Div. 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Opinion

June 24, 1949.

Present — Taylor, P.J., McCurn, Love, Vaughan and Piper, JJ.


Order modified on the law and facts in accordance with the memorandum and as modified affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellant. Memorandum: On this record we hesitate to say that the Special Term's refusal to punish the defendant for failure to make the payments required under the decree constituted an abuse of discretion. We find, however, no sufficient basis for the court's refusal to grant judgment in plaintiff's favor for the payments in arrears. Plaintiff is entitled to judgment in the sum of $1,208. All concur. (The order and judgment deny plaintiff's motion to punish defendant for contempt of court; also deny her motion for judgment for unpaid alimony.)


Summaries of

Weglarz v. Burkiewicz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 24, 1949
275 App. Div. 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)
Case details for

Weglarz v. Burkiewicz

Case Details

Full title:MARY WEGLARZ, Appellant, v. LOUIS BURKIEWICZ, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 24, 1949

Citations

275 App. Div. 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Citing Cases

Ehrenzweig v. Ehrenzweig

In the event the defendant fails to honor either or both of these conditions, the plaintiff is granted leave…

Apelbaum v. Apelbaum

Defendant, in her reply affidavit submitted on her behalf, requests that alternatively she be awarded a money…