From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weedman v. Calhoon

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Lufkin Division
Sep 15, 2021
Civil Action 9:21-CV-118 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 15, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 9:21-CV-118

09-15-2021

WILLIAM EARL WEEDMAN, JR. v. MARK CALHOON, ET AL.


ORDER ACCEPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Thad Heartfield United States District Judge

Plaintiff William Earl Weedman, Jr., a prisoner confined at the John Middleton Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Mark Calhoon and Roger L. White.

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. The Magistrate Judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The Magistrate Judge recommends granting plaintiff's motion to dismiss the action without prejudice.

The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record and the pleadings. No. objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties.

The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the report of the Magistrate Judge (docket entry #4) is ACCEPTED. Plaintiffs motion to dismiss the action (docket entry #3) is GRANTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation.


Summaries of

Weedman v. Calhoon

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Lufkin Division
Sep 15, 2021
Civil Action 9:21-CV-118 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 15, 2021)
Case details for

Weedman v. Calhoon

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM EARL WEEDMAN, JR. v. MARK CALHOON, ET AL.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Lufkin Division

Date published: Sep 15, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 9:21-CV-118 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 15, 2021)