Weed v. Astrue

Full title: VINCENT WEED, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Defendant.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Oct 18, 2011

Civil No. 10-656-TC (D. Or. Oct. 18, 2011)

Opinion

Civil No. 10-656-TC

10-18-2011

VINCENT WEED, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Defendant.

Ann Aiken

ORDER

Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on September 19, 2011. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist, 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983), Having reviewed the legal principles de novo. I find no error.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation.

Ann Aiken, United States District Judge