From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wedgeworth v. Salinas Valley State Prison

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 20, 2008
No. CIV S-07-1131 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. May. 20, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-1131 FCD DAD P.

May 20, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On February 21, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. On March 17, 2008, petitioner filed objections to the findings and recommendations. On March 25, 2008, the court granted petitioner an additional fifteen days to file an amended petition and cautioned that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this action. The time period has now expired and petitioner has not filed an amended petition and has not filed further objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 21, 2008, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed due to petitioner's failure to file an amended petition.


Summaries of

Wedgeworth v. Salinas Valley State Prison

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 20, 2008
No. CIV S-07-1131 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. May. 20, 2008)
Case details for

Wedgeworth v. Salinas Valley State Prison

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES T. WEDGEWORTH, Petitioner, v. SALINAS VALLEY STATE PRISON, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 20, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-07-1131 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. May. 20, 2008)