From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wedding v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Feb 4, 1927
290 S.W. 1059 (Ky. Ct. App. 1927)

Opinion

Decided February 4, 1927.

Appeal from Daviess Circuit Court.

W.W. KIRTLEY for appellant.

FRANK E. DAUGHERTY, Attorney General, and CHAS. F.

CREAL, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


Affirming.

Ed Wedding has appealed from a judgment imposing upon him three years' confinement in the penitentiary for stealing chickens. He has staked his hope for reversal upon the failure of the court to direct the jury to acquit him. In a former appeal from a five year sentence for this same offense, this was one of his grounds for a reversal, and in 212 Ky. 571, 279 S.W. 981, we said:

"The evidence of appellant's guilt was sufficient to take the case to the jury."

The evidence on this trial is substantially the same, and what was said in our former opinion is the law of the case.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Wedding v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Feb 4, 1927
290 S.W. 1059 (Ky. Ct. App. 1927)
Case details for

Wedding v. Commonwealth

Case Details

Full title:Wedding v. Commonwealth

Court:Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Date published: Feb 4, 1927

Citations

290 S.W. 1059 (Ky. Ct. App. 1927)
290 S.W. 1059

Citing Cases

Vanover v. Commonwealth

Our ruling on the former appeal that the case was for the jury is the law of the case, since the evidence on…