From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wech v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 30, 2002
564 S.E.2d 814 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

A02A0152.

DECIDED: APRIL 30, 2002.

Guilty plea; motion to withdraw. Clayton State Court. Before Judge CARBO.

Russell Wech, pro se.

Keith C. Martin, Solicitor-General, Evelyn Proctor, Assistant Solicitor-General, for appellee.


Acting pro se, Russell Wech, also known as Larry Rainey, appeals from the trial court's denial of his "Petition For Writ of Error Corum Nobis," in which he claimed that his guilty plea was invalid.

Wech, however, pled guilty in 1994, and it is well settled that "after the expiration of the term of court in which a guilty plea is entered and of the time for filing an appeal from the conviction, the only remedy available to a defendant for withdrawing his guilty plea is through habeas corpus proceedings." (Citation omitted.) Farist v. State, 249 Ga. App. 320, 321 (1) ( 547 S.E.2d 618) (2001). Thus, the trial court correctly concluded that it had no authority to grant any motion requesting that Wech be allowed to withdraw his guilty plea, since the motion was filed some seven years after the expiration of the term of court in which the judgment of conviction on the plea was entered. See Rooks v. State, 245 Ga. App. 655, 656 (1) ( 538 S.E.2d 555) (2000); State v. Johnson, 222 Ga. App. 156 ( 473 S.E.2d 593) (1996).

Judgment affirmed. BLACKBURN, C. J., and JOHNSON, P.J., concur.


DECIDED APRIL 30, 2002.


Summaries of

Wech v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 30, 2002
564 S.E.2d 814 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Wech v. State

Case Details

Full title:WECH v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Apr 30, 2002

Citations

564 S.E.2d 814 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002)
564 S.E.2d 814

Citing Cases

Harris v. State

Accordingly, the superior court could not rule on Harris's motion because his petition was filed more than…

State v. Carrion

(Citation omitted.) Wech v. State, 255 Ga.App. 193, 564 S.E.2d 814 (2002). Since the trial court here was not…