Opinion
November 7, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinik, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The complaint does not contain any allegations upon which a viable cause of action may be based (see, Trott v. Merit Dept. Store, 106 A.D.2d 158). The plaintiff's attempt to assert a new cause of action by resort to the bill of particulars is improper (see, Lewis v. Village of Deposit, 40 A.D.2d 730, affd 33 N.Y.2d 532). Thus, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint. Lawrence, J.P., O'Brien, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.