We cannot consider evidence outside the record on appeal, and therefore we are unable to consider most of the State's statement of facts. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.1; Webster v. State, No. 01-16-00163-CR, 2017 WL 2806786, at *5 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] June 29, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication).
See Matthews v. State, 513 S.W.3d 45, 55 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2016, pet. ref'd) (finding sufficient evidence defendant committed murder based on, among other things, evidence that defendant's DNA was recovered from victim's fingernail clippings); see also Webster v. State, No. 01-16-00163-CR, 2017 WL 2806786, at *6 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] June 29, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (location of defendant's DNA was indicative of guilt because it indicated victim attempted to defend herself from him)