From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Webster v. Hickman

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 17, 2006
No. CIV S-06-0740 GEB CMK P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-0740 GEB CMK P.

August 17, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On June 22, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 22, 2006, are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment claims are dismissed against defendants Rod Hickman, Jeanne Woodford, Scott Kernan, K. Edwards, J. Kidney and Medical Personnel for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; and

3. Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim against defendant Jeanne Woodford is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.


Summaries of

Webster v. Hickman

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 17, 2006
No. CIV S-06-0740 GEB CMK P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2006)
Case details for

Webster v. Hickman

Case Details

Full title:TOR WEBSTER, Plaintiff, v. ROD HICKMAN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 17, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-06-0740 GEB CMK P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2006)