From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weber v. Weber

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 20, 2001
783 So. 2d 333 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. 1D00-2028.

Opinion filed April 20, 2001.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Judge Laura N. Melvin.

Reversed in part and Affirmed in part.

Robert R. Kimmel of Kimmel Batson, Chartered, Pensacola, for Appellant.

Neibra Washington Collins, Pensacola, for Appellee.


We conclude that the trial court erred in reserving jurisdiction to enter a qualified domestic relations order to effect a distribution of a portion of the husband's pension. The husband is employed as a city fireman and his pension is one that is not subject to a qualified domestic relations order in order to effect an equitable distribution. See Board of Pension Trs. of City Gen. Employees Pension Plan v. Vizcaino, 635 So.2d 1012 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). On remand, the court may fashion an alternative method of distribution to ensure that the wife receives her portion of the applicable retirement benefits. We reject the arguments made in the cross appeal in this case and find no other error in the final judgment.

BENTON, PADOVANO and POLSTON, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Weber v. Weber

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 20, 2001
783 So. 2d 333 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Weber v. Weber

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL R. WEBER, Appellant, v. DORIS WEBER, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Apr 20, 2001

Citations

783 So. 2d 333 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Board of Trustees v. Langford

It stated the former husband could be ordered to pay the former wife her allotted portion of the pension each…