From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weber v. Steingart

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1927
219 App. Div. 833 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Opinion

March, 1927.

Present — Kelly, P.J., Manning, Young, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ.


Order setting aside verdict and granting new trial upon the ground that the verdict was contrary to the evidence, unanimously affirmed, costs to abide the event. There was a clear-cut question of fact presented on the evidence in this case; still we are loath to interfere with the order of the learned trial justice who saw and heard the witnesses, and who directed a new trial, being convinced that the verdict was contrary to the evidence and that it registered a miscarriage of justice. ( Boos v. Field, 192 App. Div. 696; Lyons v. Connor, 53 id. 475; Glassford v. Lewis, 82 Hun, 46; Northam v. Dutchess County Mut. Ins. Co., 68 App. Div. 475; O'Keeffe v. O'Keeffe, 208 id. 750.)


Summaries of

Weber v. Steingart

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1927
219 App. Div. 833 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)
Case details for

Weber v. Steingart

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL WEBER, Respondent, v. BARNEY STEINGART, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1927

Citations

219 App. Div. 833 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Citing Cases

Gutin v. Mascali Sons

"Concerning interference with verdicts generally, it is the rule that a trial court may not substitute its…

General Exch. Ins. Corp. v. N.Y.C. Tr. Auth

Concerning interference with verdicts generally, it is the rule that a trial court may not substitute its…