From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weber v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada
Jun 17, 1976
550 P.2d 779 (Nev. 1976)

Opinion

No. 8531

June 17, 1976

Appeal from the Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Howard W. Babcock, J.

Affirmed.

Alan B. Andrews, Las Vegas, for Appellant.

George E. Holt, District Attorney, Las Vegas, for Respondent.


OPINION


Convicted by jury of rape, battery with use of a deadly weapon, and two counts of infamous crime against nature, appellant contends he was denied a fair trial due to ineffective assistance of counsel. This contention is without merit.

After each side had rested their case, appellant's attorney made certain vague statements in the presence of the jury regarding withdrawal from the case. While we do not approve such conduct, the record fails to disclose that this action either prejudiced appellant or amounted to ineffective assistance of counsel. See: Jackson v. Warden, 91 Nev. 430, 537 P.2d 473 (1975); Warden v. Lischko, 90 Nev. 221, 523 P.2d 6 (1974); Founts v. Warden, 89 Nev. 280, 511 P.2d 111 (1973); Bean v. State, 86 Nev. 80, 465 P.2d 133 (1970).

Appellant was not represented by present counsel at trial.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Weber v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada
Jun 17, 1976
550 P.2d 779 (Nev. 1976)
Case details for

Weber v. State

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD WILLIAM WEBER, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada

Date published: Jun 17, 1976

Citations

550 P.2d 779 (Nev. 1976)
550 P.2d 779

Citing Cases

Watson v. State

Nor does a review of the record indicate that appellant was denied the effective assistance of counsel. Weber…