From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weber v. Cigna

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
May 11, 2022
2:20-CV-12593-TGB-APP (E.D. Mich. May. 11, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-CV-12593-TGB-APP

05-11-2022

JESSICA WEBER, Plaintiff, v. CIGNA, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE AND REFUND OF FILING FEE

TERRENCE G. BERG, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

After Parties notified the Court they had reached a settlement agreement, the Court dismissed this case with prejudice on June 1, 2021 and retained jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing the settlement. ECF No. 40. Plaintiff recently filed a pro se motion that the Court will construe as a motion to enforce the settlement, given that it makes claims about monies from the settlement and about Defendant's conduct after the settlement was finalized and the case dismissed. ECF No. 59.

Defendant is ordered to RESPOND to Plaintiff's filing within fourteen (14) days. Further, because Plaintiff's filing is not a new complaint, the Clerk's Office is ORDERED to refund her filing fee in the full amount of $402.00.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Weber v. Cigna

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
May 11, 2022
2:20-CV-12593-TGB-APP (E.D. Mich. May. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Weber v. Cigna

Case Details

Full title:JESSICA WEBER, Plaintiff, v. CIGNA, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: May 11, 2022

Citations

2:20-CV-12593-TGB-APP (E.D. Mich. May. 11, 2022)