From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weber v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division
Feb 14, 2008
CASE NO. 1:06-cv-00057-MP-AK (N.D. Fla. Feb. 14, 2008)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:06-cv-00057-MP-AK.

February 14, 2008


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on Doc. 12, Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, recommending that the Commissioner of Social Security's decision denying Plaintiff's applications for supplemental security income benefits filed under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, be affirmed. The Magistrate Judge filed the Report and Recommendation on Monday, January 14, 2008. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections. Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), this Court must make a de novo review of those portions to which an objection has been made. In this instance, however, no objections were made.

After a hearing on May 28, 2004, the Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") found that there had been medical improvement related to Plaintiff's ability to work. Because Plaintiff's limitations did not preclude him from performing his past relevant work as a security guard, or other jobs existing in the national economy, the ALJ concluded that Plaintiff was not disabled under the Social Security Act. Under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the Commissioner's decision must be affirmed if it is supported by substantial evidence and the correct legal standards have been applied.Graham v. Apfel, 129 F.3d 1420, 1422 (11th Cir. 1997).

The Court agrees with the Magistrate that the objective medical evidence supports the ALJ's finding that Plaintiff had medical improvement, and that because of this improvement Plaintiff is not disabled. The expert testimony and medical evidence provided the Administrative Law Judge with ample evidence to conclude that Plaintiff could perform his past relevant work, as well as other work existing in significant numbers in the national economy, and that he was therefore not disabled under the Social Security Act. Therefore, having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that it should be adopted. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Doc. 12, is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. The decision of the Commissioner denying benefits is AFFIRMED.
DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Weber v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division
Feb 14, 2008
CASE NO. 1:06-cv-00057-MP-AK (N.D. Fla. Feb. 14, 2008)
Case details for

Weber v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD A. WEBER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division

Date published: Feb 14, 2008

Citations

CASE NO. 1:06-cv-00057-MP-AK (N.D. Fla. Feb. 14, 2008)