Opinion
No. 10-12-00231-CR
08-30-2012
From the 54th District Court
McLennan County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2012-678-C2
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant filed what appeared to be a pro se interlocutory notice of appeal of the trial court's ruling on his motion for speedy trial. A week later he filed a similar notice of appeal in this case.
The Clerk of the Court notified Appellant that this case was subject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction of this apparent interlocutory appeal and that the Court might dismiss his appeal unless he showed grounds for continuing it. Appellant did not respond to the Clerk's letter.
Appellant filed a motion for speedy trial in this appeal. We dismiss it for lack of jurisdiction.
This Court lacks jurisdiction over an appeal of the trial court's alleged interlocutory ruling on a motion for speedy trial. See Abbott v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (standard for determining jurisdiction is not whether appeal is precluded by law, but whether appeal is authorized by law); Everett v. State, 91 S.W.3d 386, 386 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, no pet.) (stating that this court has jurisdiction over criminal appeals only when expressly granted by law). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
REX D. DAVIS
Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray,
Justice Davis, and
Justice Scoggins
Appeal dismissed
Opinion delivered and filed August 30, 2012
Do not publish
[CR25]