From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Webb v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Oct 8, 2009
2009 Ark. 487 (Ark. 2009)

Opinion

CR 04-920

Opinion Delivered October 8, 2009

Pro Se Petition to Reinvest Jurisdiction In Trial Court to Consider Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis [Circuit Court of Pulaski County, CR 2003-3047, CR 2004-910], Petition Dismissed.


In 2004, petitioner Micah Lamar Webb entered a plea of guilty to three felony charges in two criminal cases. The judgment and commitment orders were entered on May 7, 2004. Petitioner orally moved to withdraw the guilty pleas on May 10, 2004. The trial court denied the motion, and we affirmed. Webb v. State, 365 Ark. 22, 223 S.W.3d 796 (2006).

Now before us is a petition to reinvest jurisdiction in the trial court to consider a petition for writ of error coram nobis. Webb states in that petition that he filed a petition for writ of error coram nobis in the trial court in 2009. According to Webb, the trial court denied the petition because he failed to initially obtain this court's permission to proceed in the trial court with a petition for writ of error coram nobis. The trial court's order is not attached to the petition, and there is no indication that a notice of appeal was filed from the order.

For clerical purposes, the instant pleading was assigned the same docket number as the order that denied postconviction relief.

A circuit court can entertain a petition for writ of error coram nobis after a judgment of conviction is affirmed on direct appeal only after we grant permission. Dansby v. State, 343 Ark. 635, 637, 37 S.W.3d 599, 600 (2001) (per curiam). However, a petition for writ of error coram nobis is filed directly in the trial court where a judgment of conviction was entered on a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, or the judgment of conviction was not appealed. Magby v. State, 348 Ark. 415, 418 n. 1, 72 S.W.3d 508, 509 (2002) (per curiam).

Here, as petitioner Webb entered guilty pleas in the underlying criminal matters, and his only prior appeal concerned a claim for postconviction relief, Magby is controlling. Accordingly, we dismiss the instant petition. Petitioner may proceed directly in the circuit court without first obtaining leave of this court to do so.

Petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Webb v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Oct 8, 2009
2009 Ark. 487 (Ark. 2009)
Case details for

Webb v. State

Case Details

Full title:Micah Lamar WEBB, Petitioner v. STATE of Arkansas, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Oct 8, 2009

Citations

2009 Ark. 487 (Ark. 2009)

Citing Cases

Lee v. State

When a petitioner entered a plea of guilty and his or her coram nobis petition challenges the judgment of…