From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Webb v. Sharma

United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
Oct 27, 2021
No. 21-22053-CIV-WILLIAMS (S.D. Fla. Oct. 27, 2021)

Opinion

21-22053-CIV-WILLIAMS

10-27-2021

MATTHEW WEBB, et al. Plaintiffs, v. ANITA P. SHARMA, Defendant.


ORDER

KATHLEEN M. WILLIAMS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Chris McAliley's Report and Recommendation (the “Report”) (DE 20) on Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (the “Motion”) (DE 8). In the Report, Judge McAliley explains that Defendant proffered undisputed evidence showing that Plaintiffs' total losses exceed $75,000 at the time of the removal. (DE 20 at 4). Accordingly, Judge McAliley recommends that the Motion (DE 8) be DENIED. The Parties did not file objections to the Report and the time to do has now passed. Accordingly, upon an independent review of the Report, the Motion, and the Record, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The conclusions in the Report (DE 20) are AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED.
2. Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (DE 8) is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Webb v. Sharma

United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
Oct 27, 2021
No. 21-22053-CIV-WILLIAMS (S.D. Fla. Oct. 27, 2021)
Case details for

Webb v. Sharma

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW WEBB, et al. Plaintiffs, v. ANITA P. SHARMA, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Florida

Date published: Oct 27, 2021

Citations

No. 21-22053-CIV-WILLIAMS (S.D. Fla. Oct. 27, 2021)