From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Webb v. Louisiana

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Sep 23, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO: 12-1301 (W.D. La. Sep. 23, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO: 12-1301

09-23-2014

REBECCA WEBB v. STATE OF LOUISIANA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT, ARLENA MCDONALD, AND JAMES M. LEBLANC IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY


MAGISTRATE JUDGE KIRK ORDER

Pursuant to this Court's prior Order, dated March 31, 2014, granting in part and denying in part Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. #15], the Defendants were granted leave to re-urge their motion as it pertains to the remaining claims. [See Doc. #37]. In accordance therewith, the Defendants have provided supplemental briefing to the Court [Docs. ##39 and 51] and re-urged their motion for summary judgment [See Doc. #51, p. 2]. Plaintiff has likewise filed a supplemental response in opposition to summary judgment [Doc. #58]. Upon due consideration and finding that genuine issues of material fact remain, the re-urged motion for summary judgment [Doc. #15] is hereby DENIED as to Plaintiff's disability claims under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, as well as Plaintiffs Title VII retaliation claim.

Defendants also move for summary judgment in favor of Defendant Arlena McDonald, seeking to have all remaining claims against her dismissed with prejudice. The Court agrees. "[T]itle VII does not permit the imposition of liability upon individuals unless they meet title VJJ's definition of employer,'" and McDonald is not included in that definition. See Grant v. Lone Star Co., 21 F.3d 649, 653 (5th Cir. 1994). Similarly, "the weight of judicial authority supports the conclusion that individual defendants cannot be held liable for violation of Title II of the ADA." Berthelot v. Stadler, No. Civ. A. 99-2009,2000 WL 1568224, at *2 (E.D. La. Oct. 19,2000) (collecting cases); see also Labit v. Landry, 11-cv-0574, 2012 WL 1458108, at *2-3 (W.D. La. March 27, 2012) (collecting cases). And, finally, there is no basis for individual liability against McDonald under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. See Lollar v. Baker, 196 F.3d 603, 608-09 (5th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, any and all claims against Defendant Arlena McDonald are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED, in Shreveport, Louisiana, this 23 day of September, 2014.

/s/_________

DONALD E. WALTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Webb v. Louisiana

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Sep 23, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO: 12-1301 (W.D. La. Sep. 23, 2014)
Case details for

Webb v. Louisiana

Case Details

Full title:REBECCA WEBB v. STATE OF LOUISIANA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION

Date published: Sep 23, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO: 12-1301 (W.D. La. Sep. 23, 2014)