From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Webb v. Kernan

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 1, 2007
No. CIV S-05-0291 DFL GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 1, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-0291 DFL GGH P.

May 1, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's April 20, 2007 request for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice to a renewal of the motion at a later stage of the proceedings.


Summaries of

Webb v. Kernan

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 1, 2007
No. CIV S-05-0291 DFL GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 1, 2007)
Case details for

Webb v. Kernan

Case Details

Full title:RONDELL L. WEBB, Petitioner, v. SCOTT KERNAN, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 1, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-05-0291 DFL GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 1, 2007)