From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

WEBB v. FAIN

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Jan 9, 2006
Civil No. 02-645-CO (D. Or. Jan. 9, 2006)

Opinion

Civil No. 02-645-CO.

January 9, 2006


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Cooney filed his Findings and Recommendation on December 19, 2005. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Cooney's Findings and Recommendation.


Summaries of

WEBB v. FAIN

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Jan 9, 2006
Civil No. 02-645-CO (D. Or. Jan. 9, 2006)
Case details for

WEBB v. FAIN

Case Details

Full title:VINCENT L. WEBB, et al, Plaintiffs, v. CHRIS FAIN, et al, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Jan 9, 2006

Citations

Civil No. 02-645-CO (D. Or. Jan. 9, 2006)