From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Webb v. Barskey

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 21, 2005
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 51748 (N.Y. App. Term 2005)

Opinion

2004-1687 W C.

Decided October 21, 2005.

Appeal from an amended judgment of the Justice Court of the Town of Cortlandt, Westchester County (Daniel A. McCarthy, J.), entered August 12, 2004. The amended judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiffs the principal sum of $1,950 and awarded defendant the principal sum of $265 upon his counterclaim, resulting in a net judgment for plaintiffs in the principal sum of $1,685.

Amended judgment unanimously modified by increasing the award to defendant upon his counterclaim to the principal sum of $1,565, thereby reducing the net judgment awarded to plaintiffs to the principal sum of $385; as so modified, affirmed without costs.

PRESENT: RUDOLPH, P.J., ANGIOLILLO and McCABE, JJ.


Plaintiffs commenced this small claims action to recover their security deposit. Defendant counterclaimed to recover damages because plaintiffs failed to vacate the apartment at the end of their lease and for property damage caused by plaintiffs. After a trial, the court held that plaintiffs were entitled to recover their $1,950 security deposit, but awarded defendant the principal sum of $265 upon his counterclaim due to property damage caused by plaintiffs. Defendant appeals, claiming that the amount awarded upon his counterclaim, which was used to offset the amount awarded to plaintiffs, was insufficient.

Inasmuch as it was undisputed at trial that plaintiffs failed to vacate the apartment at the end of their lease, defendant was entitled to recover the principal sum of $1,300 as use and occupancy for the following month ( see Matter of Eight Cooper Equities v. Abrams, 143 Misc 2d 52, 55 [Sup Ct, NY County 1989] ["Actual surrender is traditionally effected by vacating the premises and returning the keys to the landlord"]; 1 Dolan, Rasch's Landlord and Tenant-Summary Proceedings §§ 10:8-10:9, at 42-383 [4th ed]). As a result, substantial justice ( see UJCA 1807) requires that the principal sum awarded to defendant upon his counterclaim be increased to $1,565, thereby reducing the net amount to which plaintiffs are entitled to the sum of $385. Defendant's remaining contentions lack merit.


Summaries of

Webb v. Barskey

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 21, 2005
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 51748 (N.Y. App. Term 2005)
Case details for

Webb v. Barskey

Case Details

Full title:TINA WEBB and BRYAN WEBB, Respondents, v. HERMAN BARSKEY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 21, 2005

Citations

2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 51748 (N.Y. App. Term 2005)