From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Webb v. Bank of Am.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 27, 2021
2:13-cv-02006-MCE-AC (E.D. Cal. Dec. 27, 2021)

Opinion

2:13-cv-02006-MCE-AC

12-27-2021

ANGELLA S. WEBB, individually, on behalf of all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the general public; Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive; Defendants.

DANIEL J. MULLIGAN, SBN 103129 JENKINS MULLIGAN & GABRIEL LLP ERIC ANDREW MERCER, SBN 248707 LAW OFFICE OF ERIC ANDREW MERCER


DANIEL J. MULLIGAN, SBN 103129

JENKINS MULLIGAN & GABRIEL LLP

ERIC ANDREW MERCER, SBN 248707

LAW OFFICE OF ERIC ANDREW MERCER

ORDER TO UNSEAL ORDER FOR LIMITED PURPOSE (DKT. NO. 77)

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Having read and considered the Ex Parte Request to Unseal Order (ECF No. 82), and good cause appearing, The Order (ECF No. 77) granting Defendant's request to enforce settlement agreement is unsealed for the limited purpose of disclosure to the State Bar of California.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Webb v. Bank of Am.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 27, 2021
2:13-cv-02006-MCE-AC (E.D. Cal. Dec. 27, 2021)
Case details for

Webb v. Bank of Am.

Case Details

Full title:ANGELLA S. WEBB, individually, on behalf of all others similarly situated…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 27, 2021

Citations

2:13-cv-02006-MCE-AC (E.D. Cal. Dec. 27, 2021)