From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Webb v. Arpaio

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Sep 23, 2005
No. CV-05-1463-PHX-EHC (JI) (D. Ariz. Sep. 23, 2005)

Opinion

No. CV-05-1463-PHX-EHC (JI).

September 23, 2005


ORDER


The Court's service Order (#3) filed July 5, 2005, directed that the Clerk of the Court forward service packets to Plaintiff and that Plaintiff complete them and return them within 20 days. Plaintiff returned service packets on July 18, 2005, but they had insufficient addresses for service, and insufficient copies and documents submitted. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court returned the service packets to Plaintiff on July 19, 2005 for completion. Plaintiff did not return them, and by Order entered August 16, 2005 (#7), Plaintiff was given ten days to do so and was warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal. To date, Plaintiff has not returned completed service packets.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Complaint (#1) and this case are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute.


Summaries of

Webb v. Arpaio

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Sep 23, 2005
No. CV-05-1463-PHX-EHC (JI) (D. Ariz. Sep. 23, 2005)
Case details for

Webb v. Arpaio

Case Details

Full title:Phillip Matthew Webb, Plaintiff v. Joseph M. Arpaio, et al., Defendant(s)

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Sep 23, 2005

Citations

No. CV-05-1463-PHX-EHC (JI) (D. Ariz. Sep. 23, 2005)