From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weaver v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 9, 1992
608 So. 2d 947 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 91-01444.

December 9, 1992.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Harry Lee Coe, III, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Megan Olson, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Brenda S. Taylor, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


We affirm both the revocation of the appellant's probation and the sentence imposed. However, there was no evidence presented to the trial court to support several of the violations of probation included in the revocation order. The evidence did show that the appellant had absconded from his probation, and had committed a new law violation. The revocation order must be corrected to accurately reflect the evidence before the trial court. Dukes v. State, 528 So.2d 531 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

Reversed and remanded.

RYDER, A.C.J., and HALL and BLUE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Weaver v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 9, 1992
608 So. 2d 947 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Weaver v. State

Case Details

Full title:CRAIG E. WEAVER, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Dec 9, 1992

Citations

608 So. 2d 947 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)