From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weaver v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 19, 1991
200 Ga. App. 82 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

A91A0989.

DECIDED JUNE 19, 1991.

Aggravated assault. Rockdale Superior Court. Before Judge Peeler, Senior Judge.

Hurl R. Taylor, Jr., for appellant.

Robert F. Mumford, District Attorney, William F. Todd, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


Defendant Weaver appeals his conviction of two counts of aggravated assault. Held:

1. The record on appeal discloses no objection below preserving the issues now raised by defendant's first, fourth and eighth enumerations of error. We may not decide issues raised for the first time on appeal. Romano v. State, 193 Ga. App. 682 (1) ( 388 S.E.2d 757); Floyd v. State, 188 Ga. App. 24 (1) ( 372 S.E.2d 287).

2. Next, defendant asserts error in the denial of his motion under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 ( 106 SC 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69). The trial court accepted the prosecutor's explanation that both of the prospective jurors in question were stricken because they knew defendant. The trial court's conclusion that the prosecutor had provided a racially neutral explanation for challenging the prospective black jurors cannot be found to be clearly erroneous. We find no error in the denial of defendant's Batson motion. Burgess v. State, 194 Ga. App. 179 ( 390 S.E.2d 92); Kincey v. State, 191 Ga. App. 300 (1) ( 381 S.E.2d 439).

3. In his third enumeration of error, defendant contends that the evidence was insufficient to authorize the verdict. However, the State's evidence shows that defendant repeatedly fired a gun at an automobile occupied by the two victims. The evidence adduced at trial was sufficient to authorize the conviction of defendant under the standard enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560). See Williams v. State, 198 Ga. App. 214 (1) ( 400 S.E.2d 638).

4. Defendant's sixth and seventh enumerations of error relate to his motion for supersedeas bond. Considering these enumerations in reverse order, we note that there was no failure by the trial court to enter findings of fact on the motion. The trial court found that defendant fired a gun at passengers in a moving car and threatened a witness with death if she told anyone. Based on these findings, the trial court concluded that defendant posed a substantial risk of danger to the community and denied his motion for supersedeas bond. The trial court's findings being supported by the evidence we find no error in the denial of defendant's motion for supersedeas bond. Birge v. State, 238 Ga. 88 ( 230 S.E.2d 895).

Judgment affirmed. Sognier, C. J., and Andrews, J., concur.

DECIDED JUNE 19, 1991.


Summaries of

Weaver v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 19, 1991
200 Ga. App. 82 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Weaver v. State

Case Details

Full title:WEAVER v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jun 19, 1991

Citations

200 Ga. App. 82 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991)
406 S.E.2d 574

Citing Cases

Williford v. State

Notice of appeal on the merits of this case was timely filed in the trial court contemporaneously with the…

Wiley v. State

This contention presents nothing for appellate review as defendant did not assert a motion for directed…