From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weaver v. Kendall

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 31, 2017
No. 2:17-cv-1298 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2017)

Opinion

No. 2:17-cv-1298 CKD P

08-31-2017

WILLIE WEAVER, Plaintiff, v. KENDALL, Defendant.


ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By an order filed June 29, 2017, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma pauperis application or pay the filing fee within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: August 31, 2017

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1
weav1298.fifp


Summaries of

Weaver v. Kendall

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 31, 2017
No. 2:17-cv-1298 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2017)
Case details for

Weaver v. Kendall

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE WEAVER, Plaintiff, v. KENDALL, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 31, 2017

Citations

No. 2:17-cv-1298 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2017)