From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weatherall v. Sloan

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Apr 9, 2010
Civil Action No. 10-cv-00336-BNB (D. Colo. Apr. 9, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-cv-00336-BNB.

April 9, 2010


ORDER


On March 29, 2010, Mr. Weatherall filed a Reply to Respondents' Pre-Answer Response. In the Reply, Mr. Weatherall asserts inordinate delay regarding the processing of his Colo. R. Crim. P. 35(c) postconviction in state court, which after eleven years still is pending in the Colorado Court of Appeals. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that within twenty-one days from the date of this Order Respondents shall respond to Mr. Weatherall's Reply and brief his claim of inordinate delay. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Weatherall shall have twenty-one days from the date Respondents file a Supplemental Response to file a supplement to his Reply.


Summaries of

Weatherall v. Sloan

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Apr 9, 2010
Civil Action No. 10-cv-00336-BNB (D. Colo. Apr. 9, 2010)
Case details for

Weatherall v. Sloan

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER WEATHERALL, Applicant, v. BRIGHAM SLOAN, and THE ATTORNEY…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Apr 9, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-cv-00336-BNB (D. Colo. Apr. 9, 2010)