From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weary v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Mar 27, 1992
596 So. 2d 952 (Ala. Crim. App. 1992)

Opinion

CR-90-928.

March 27, 1992.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Montgomery County; William R. Gordon, Judge.

Arthur Lee Weary, pro se.

James H. Evans, Atty. Gen., and Yvonne A. Henderson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Rob Turner, Montgomery, for appellant on return to remand.


ON RETURN TO REMAND


We remanded this case to the trial court with instructions to determine whether the appellant wished to pursue his direct appeal. The trial court has now filed its return, which states that the appellant, appearing with his counsel in open court, has "informed the court that he does not wish to pursue this appeal."

For the reason stated, the appeal is due to be, and it is hereby, dismissed.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

All Judges concur.


Summaries of

Weary v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Mar 27, 1992
596 So. 2d 952 (Ala. Crim. App. 1992)
Case details for

Weary v. State

Case Details

Full title:Arthur Lee WEARY v. STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Mar 27, 1992

Citations

596 So. 2d 952 (Ala. Crim. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

Ousley v. State

The analysis for determining the appropriateness of consecutive vs. concurrent enhanced sentences involves a…