WearForce Pty Ltd v. Talon Eng'g, SDN BHD

Full title: WEARFORCE, PTY LTD., Plaintiff, v. TALON ENGINEERING, SDN BHD, Defendant…

Court: United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Nov 23, 2022

3:21-cv-00284-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Nov. 23, 2022)

Opinion

3:21-cv-00284-MMD-CSD

11-23-2022

WEARFORCE, PTY LTD., Plaintiff, v. TALON ENGINEERING, SDN BHD, Defendant, AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS

HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE PLC GLENN E. FORBIS (pro hac vice) J. BRADLEY LUCHSINGER (pro hac vice) Matthew Satchwell (Pro Hac Vice) Illinois Bar No. 6290672 DLA PIPER LLP (US) DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC STEVEN A. CALOIARO Nevada Bar No. 12344 Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant WearForce, Pty Ltd. BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP Matthew D. Francis (NV Bar No. 6978) Attorneys for Defendant Talon Engineering SDN BHD

MIRANDA M. DU. CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE PLC

GLENN E. FORBIS (pro hac vice)

J. BRADLEY LUCHSINGER (pro hac vice)

Matthew Satchwell (Pro Hac Vice) Illinois Bar No. 6290672

DLA PIPER LLP (US)

DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC

STEVEN A. CALOIARO Nevada Bar No. 12344

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant WearForce, Pty Ltd.

BROWNSTEIN HYATT

FARBER SCHRECK, LLP

Matthew D. Francis (NV Bar No. 6978)

Attorneys for Defendant Talon Engineering SDN BHD

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

MIRANDA M. DU. CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff Wearforce PTY LTD. and Defendant TALON Engineering, SDN BHD, subject to the approval of the Court, that pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), all claims and counterclaims in the above-captioned action are dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees.

It is therefore ordered that this case is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the stipulation of the parties. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.