From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wayne v. Clark

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 29, 2022
Civil Action 21-4209 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 29, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 21-4209

12-29-2022

JOHN WAYNE v. MICHAEL CLARK, DEREK OBERLANDER, JAMIE SORBER, JOHN WETZEL, GEORGE LITTLE, TABB BICKELL, and LEE ESTOCK


ORDER

TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, J.

NOW, this 29th day of December, 2022, upon consideration of Commonwealth Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 37), the plaintiff's response, and the defendants' reply, it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED as follows:

1. To the extent the motion seeks to dismiss Counts I and II of the Amended Complaint against defendants Michael Clark, Derek Oberlander, Jamie Sorber and Lee Estock, it is GRANTED.

2. All claims against defendants Michael Clark, Derek Oberlander, Jamie Sorber and Lee Estock are DISMISSED.

3. To the extent the motion seeks to dismiss Counts I and II of the Amended Complaint against defendants John Wetzel, George Little and Tabb Bickell, it is DENIED.


Summaries of

Wayne v. Clark

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 29, 2022
Civil Action 21-4209 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Wayne v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:JOHN WAYNE v. MICHAEL CLARK, DEREK OBERLANDER, JAMIE SORBER, JOHN WETZEL…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 29, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 21-4209 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 29, 2022)