From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Waydale Corporation v. Pearlman

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 16, 1930
138 Misc. 714 (N.Y. App. Term 1930)

Opinion

December 16, 1930.

Appeal from the Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Fifth District.

Propper Lichtig [ Karl Propper of counsel], for the appellant.

Abraham N. Pearlman, for the respondent.


We deem it imperative to comment upon the slovenly and careless manner in which records on appeal are submitted, without the slightest regard for the proper form of final orders and judgments, or the distinction between decisions and judgments.

As there is neither judgment nor final order included in the return in this case the appeal is dismissed.

All concur; present, LYDON, LEVY and FRANKENTHALER, JJ.


Summaries of

Waydale Corporation v. Pearlman

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 16, 1930
138 Misc. 714 (N.Y. App. Term 1930)
Case details for

Waydale Corporation v. Pearlman

Case Details

Full title:WAYDALE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. BERTHA PEARLMAN, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Dec 16, 1930

Citations

138 Misc. 714 (N.Y. App. Term 1930)
248 N.Y.S. 299