From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Way v. Vetter

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 31, 2024
23-CV-08800 (PMH) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 31, 2024)

Opinion

23-CV-08800 (PMH)

01-31-2024

DAVID WAY, Plaintiff, v. CODY VETTER and THOMAS ARANDA, Defendants.


ORDER

PHILIP M. HALPERN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

On October 6, 2023, David Way (“Plaintiff”) commenced the instant action against Cody Vetter and Thomas Aranda (“Defendants”). (Doc. 1).

On October 10, 2023, the Clerk of Court issued summonses as to Defendants. (Docs. 5-6). Plaintiff filed affidavits of service as to Defendants on December 1 and 6, 2023. (Docs. 7-8). Defendants did not answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. There has been no activity on the docket since the filing of the affidavits of service.

Plaintiff is directed to comply with this Court's Individual Practices Rule 4(B) by February 28, 2024. Failure to strictly comply with this Court's Individual Practices and this order may result in dismissal of this action in its entirety, without prejudice, for want of prosecution under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Way v. Vetter

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 31, 2024
23-CV-08800 (PMH) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 31, 2024)
Case details for

Way v. Vetter

Case Details

Full title:DAVID WAY, Plaintiff, v. CODY VETTER and THOMAS ARANDA, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jan 31, 2024

Citations

23-CV-08800 (PMH) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 31, 2024)