From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wauls v. Butler

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 29, 2005
No. CIV-S-03-0468 MCE/JFM P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2005)

Opinion

No. CIV-S-03-0468 MCE/JFM P.

September 29, 2005


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On August 26, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 26, 2005, are adopted in full; and

2. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.


Summaries of

Wauls v. Butler

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 29, 2005
No. CIV-S-03-0468 MCE/JFM P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2005)
Case details for

Wauls v. Butler

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL LEE WAULS, Petitioner, v. DIANA K. BUTLER, WARDEN, ET AL.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 29, 2005

Citations

No. CIV-S-03-0468 MCE/JFM P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2005)