From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Waugh v. McWane, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jun 6, 2018
2017-2343 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 6, 2018)

Opinion

2017-2343

06-06-2018

TOM W. WAUGH, Appellant v. MCWANE, INC., Appellee

RENE A. VAZQUEZ, Sinergia Technology Law Group, PLLC, Leesburg, VA, argued for appellant. CHRISTOPHER BRANTLEY KELLY, Alston & Bird LLP, Atlanta, GA, argued for appellee. Also represented by MICHAEL S. CONNOR, KIRK T. BRADLEY, Charlotte, NC.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2016-00266.

JUDGMENT

RENE A. VAZQUEZ, Sinergia Technology Law Group, PLLC, Leesburg, VA, argued for appellant. CHRISTOPHER BRANTLEY KELLY, Alston & Bird LLP, Atlanta, GA, argued for appellee. Also represented by MICHAEL S. CONNOR, KIRK T. BRADLEY, Charlotte, NC. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (WALLACH, SCHALL, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 6, 2018

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Waugh v. McWane, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jun 6, 2018
2017-2343 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 6, 2018)
Case details for

Waugh v. McWane, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TOM W. WAUGH, Appellant v. MCWANE, INC., Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jun 6, 2018

Citations

2017-2343 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 6, 2018)