Opinion
Argued January 2, 1872
Decided May term, 1872
E.H. Berm for the appellant.
A. Robertson for the respondents.
HUNT, C., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Order affirmed, and judgment absolute against plaintiff, with costs.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
WAUGH v. FIELDING ET AL
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 1, 1872
48 N.Y. 681 (N.Y. 1872)
Summaries of
WAUGH v. FIELDING ET AL
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 1, 1872
48 N.Y. 681 (N.Y. 1872)
Case details for
WAUGH v. FIELDING ET AL
Case Details
Full title:ELIZABETH WAUGH, Administratrix, Appellant, v . JOHN FIELDING et al.…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: May 1, 1872
Citations
48 N.Y. 681 (N.Y. 1872)
Citing Cases
Western Union Tel. Co. v. Tatum
Questions as to this do not call for facts but instead the secret and undisclosed intention of the witness.…
Saxe v. Penokee Lumber Co.In the first place the question did not call for a fact, but instead for a mere operation of the witness'…