From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watts v. Sullivanl

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 1, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-1566 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-1566 GGH P

08-01-2012

TIMOTHY WATTS, Plaintiff, v. L. SULLIVANL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff filed the instant case which is before the undersigned. However, a review of the complaint indicates that it is in fact an amended complaint in plaintiff's continuing case in this court, No. 2:10-cv-2688 GEB CKD P. See Complaint at 26.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The complaint in this case (Doc.1) shall be re-filed by the Clerk of the Court in No. 2:10-cv-2688 GEB CKD P;

2. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is vacated, as plaintiff already paid the filing fee in the other case.

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

Gregory G. Hollows

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
GGH: AB - watt1566.ord


Summaries of

Watts v. Sullivanl

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 1, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-1566 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2012)
Case details for

Watts v. Sullivanl

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY WATTS, Plaintiff, v. L. SULLIVANL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 1, 2012

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-1566 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2012)