From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watts v. Ramos

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 10, 2011
No. CIV S-09-1515-KJM-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-1515-KJM-CMK-P

08-10-2011

TIMOTHY WATTS, Plaintiff, v. R. RAMOS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff's motion to compel (Doc. 35). It is not clear whether plaintiff seeks an order compelling initial responses to discovery requests or further responses. This is because plaintiff does not state the dates discovery was served, whether defendants responded, and, if so, how responses are inadequate. Absent this basic information, the court cannot evaluate whether relief is warranted.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to compel (Doc. 35) is denied.

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Watts v. Ramos

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 10, 2011
No. CIV S-09-1515-KJM-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2011)
Case details for

Watts v. Ramos

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY WATTS, Plaintiff, v. R. RAMOS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 10, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-09-1515-KJM-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2011)