From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watts v. Manheim Twp. Sch. Dist.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Sep 12, 2014
627 Pa. 253 (Pa. 2014)

Opinion

No. 191 MAL 2014.

09-12-2014

Timothy L. WATTS, Respondent v. MANHEIM TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT, Petitioner.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 12th day of September, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:

(1) Does the Public School Code of 1949 require the Manheim Township School District to provide transportation services to a resident pupil to and from more than one location within the school district?

(2) Did the Commonwealth Court err in interpreting In re Residence Hearing Before Bd. of Sch. Dir., Cumberland Valley Sch. Dist., 560 Pa. 366, 744 A.2d 1272 (2000), to mean that a child can have more than one residence for

school purposes, including transportation services under Section 1361 of the Public School Code of 1949?


Summaries of

Watts v. Manheim Twp. Sch. Dist.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Sep 12, 2014
627 Pa. 253 (Pa. 2014)
Case details for

Watts v. Manheim Twp. Sch. Dist.

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY L. WATTS, Respondent v. MANHEIM TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Sep 12, 2014

Citations

627 Pa. 253 (Pa. 2014)
99 A.3d 532

Citing Cases

Watts v. Manheim Twp. Sch. Dist.

school purposes, including transportation services under Section 1361 of the Public School Code of 1949?Watts…

Watts v. Manheim Twp. Sch. Dist.

(2) Did the Commonwealth Court err in interpreting In re Residence Hearing Before Bd. of Sch. Dir.,…