From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watts v. Lockyer

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 28, 2007
No. CIV S-06-1773 DFL GGH P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-1773 DFL GGH P.

March 28, 2007


ORDER


On August 10, 2006, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause within thirty days why this action should not be construed as a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Thirty days passed and plaintiff did not respond to this order. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the August 10, 2006, order, this action is construed as a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Plaintiff is directed to file a habeas corpus petition within twenty days.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This action is construed as a petition for writ of habeas corpus; within twenty days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file a habeas corpus petition;

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff the form for a habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.


Summaries of

Watts v. Lockyer

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 28, 2007
No. CIV S-06-1773 DFL GGH P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2007)
Case details for

Watts v. Lockyer

Case Details

Full title:MARK W. WATTS, Plaintiff, v. BILL LOCKYER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 28, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-06-1773 DFL GGH P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2007)