From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watts v. Hobbs

U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 30, 2012
132 S. Ct. 2122 (2012)

Opinion

No. 11–8998.

04-30-2012

Frank WATTS, II, petitioner, v. Ray HOBBS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction.


Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (per curiam ).


Summaries of

Watts v. Hobbs

U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 30, 2012
132 S. Ct. 2122 (2012)
Case details for

Watts v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:WATTS, FRANK v. HOBBS, DIR., AR DOC

Court:U.S. Supreme Court

Date published: Apr 30, 2012

Citations

132 S. Ct. 2122 (2012)
182 L. Ed. 2d 866
80 U.S.L.W. 3613